The Spanish Prisoner and the Nigerian Prince: How a 19th-Century Scam Built the Internet’s Oldest Joke

Before the “Nigerian prince” started filling inboxes with promises of fortune, his ancestor was writing letters from a Spanish jail.

The Original Con: A Nobleman in Trouble

In the late 1800s, long before anyone had heard of phishing or spam, a handwritten letter began circulating across Europe. It told the story of a wealthy Spanish nobleman who had been unjustly imprisoned and could not access his fortune. The writer explained that if the recipient would send a small amount of money to help secure his release, an enormous reward would follow once he was free.

The scheme became known as the Spanish Prisoner, and it worked with surprising success. It was polite, detailed, and believable enough to disarm even well-educated recipients. What made it powerful was its emotional precision. The plea appealed to compassion while hinting at extraordinary reward, allowing greed to hide behind generosity.

The genius of the scam was not in the details but in the psychology. The story looked credible on paper, and the flattery that accompanied it gave victims the feeling of being chosen for something secret and special.

Dear Sir,

Being imprisoned here by bankruptcy, I beg you aid me by procuring a sum of 36,000 Dollars from my several checks, cashable at important banks in America.

Being for the release of my baggage pending to the Registrar of the Court, the expense of my trial and recovery of my fortunes, containing several packets where I have hidden the checks that lead to said sum.

In payment I offer you the third part — viz 12,000 Dollars.

I cannot receive your answer in the prison, but you can send a cablegram to a person of my confidence who will deliver it here.

Awaiting your cable to instruct you all my secret, I greet —

Yours truly,

R. de J.

From Handwritten Letters to Global Email

A century later, the same basic trick found new life.

By the 1980s, Nigeria was struggling through economic instability while global communication technology was becoming cheap and fast. Fax machines and early email systems connected the world in ways that had once been impossible. That shift created the perfect medium for an old story to be told again.

The nobleman in distress was reborn as a deposed African prince, an exiled oil minister, or the widow of a general. The letter became a digital message, but the structure was unchanged: a personal appeal, a promise of immense reward, and a request for a small act of trust to begin.

The scheme was soon known as 419 fraud, named for the section of Nigeria’s criminal code covering advance-fee scams.

The Internet Turns a Con into a Culture

By the 1990s, the Internet gave the scam new wings. Millions of people were online, many using email for the first time. Sending one message now cost nothing, and a single scammer could reach thousands of strangers in a day.

“Dear Sir, I am Prince Abacha, heir to a fortune of twenty-five million dollars...”

The broken English and exaggerated claims made the scam sound laughable, yet that was part of its strategy. The absurdity filtered out skeptics and left only the most trusting, the most hopeful, and often the most isolated.

The financial toll was staggering. According to FBI reports, advance-fee scams have cost victims more than $80M dollars annually in recent years, and those figures represent only the people who came forward.

One woman in Oregon lost $400k over two years trying to help a fake heir claim his inheritance. Another fraudster, Obinwanne Okeke, known online as “Invictus Obi,” orchestrated email scams that stole over eleven million dollars from businesses and individuals. Even self-styled social media celebrity Hushpuppi was convicted for laundering millions obtained through fake business deals.

What began as one con artist’s letter evolved into a global industry of deception.

The Hidden Infrastructure: Domains as the Scammer’s Stage

Every performance needs a stage, and on the Internet that stage is the domain name.

Before a scammer can ask for money, they need a space that looks legitimate. The domain system provides that illusion instantly. Anyone can register a professional-looking domain, create a fake brand, and begin sending messages that appear authentic.

• Lookalike domains mimic trusted brands with small spelling changes, such as royaltrust-ng.com or bankofafrica-secure.net.
• Hijacked domains take over expired or neglected sites and use them to host fake login pages or forms.
• Disposable domains appear for a few weeks, collect sensitive data or wire transfers, and disappear before anyone traces them.

In one example, researchers uncovered a phishing campaign hosted on appshift.tech, a short-lived domain that featured synthetic videos of supposed “officials” confirming identities. It was a modern theater of fraud built on rented digital property.

The same infrastructure that powers online stores and startups also supports deception. The speed and simplicity of domain registration make it easy for anyone to appear credible, even for a few hours at a time.

The Domain Market’s Blind Spot

The domain economy was built on efficiency and scale. Registration is fast, inexpensive, and often anonymous. These qualities help legitimate creators but also enable fraud.

Expired domains are a favorite tool for scammers. Once ownership lapses, a bad actor can claim the domain and inherit its history, backlinks, and reputation. Emails sent from that address suddenly carry the weight of authenticity. A hijacked domain can be used to solicit payments, collect passwords, or redirect visitors to cloned websites.

The modern domain market, in many ways, resembles a global real estate system with limited zoning. Most properties are built for honest business, but a few are occupied by con artists who know how to exploit the system before the authorities arrive.

From Punchline to Playbook

By the early 2000s, the “Nigerian prince” scam had become a cultural joke. Late-night hosts mocked it, spam filters learned to block it, and anyone who received the email felt certain they would never fall for such a thing.

But the con did not die; it evolved again.

The same structure of trust and urgency now drives romance scams, fake investment pitches, and business-email compromise attacks that collectively cost companies billions each year. The Internet did not invent deception; it simply gave it new tools.

The old Spanish Prisoner never disappeared, he just learned to code.

The Lesson That Refuses to Expire

Technology keeps changing, but the emotional script stays the same. People still want to believe they are special, chosen, or about to receive good fortune. Scammers understand this better than most marketers. They know that the story only needs to feel true long enough for someone to act on it.

From sealed envelopes to encrypted emails, the same dynamic repeats itself. The tools of communication evolve, and with them, the architecture of fraud. The line between credibility and illusion grows thinner with every innovation.

The Takeaway

Scams do not survive because people are foolish, they survive because hope is permanent.

Every generation believes it is too smart to be deceived, and every generation is wrong. The Spanish Prisoner became the Nigerian Prince, and tomorrow he will appear as something else entirely. What never changes is the human desire to believe that the next message might finally be the one that makes everything better.

‍

‍